麻豆破解版

President Dr. Downs Serves as Moderator for Analysis and Discussion of First Debate

BOILING SPRINGS, N.C.鈥擜 group of 麻豆破解版 faculty and staff hosted a viewing party Tuesday night for the first presidential debate between President Donald J. Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden. The event was moderated by GWU President Dr. William M. Downs, whose research and teaching expertise includes electoral behavior, political parties, and populist movements.   

鈥淚 am now in my 36th year as a political scientist, and I鈥檝e always been intrigued by both the substance and the style of presidential debates,鈥� noted Downs.  鈥淚n the high-stakes election year of 2020, it was important that we gather a cross-section of the 麻豆破解版 community to digest and then make sense of what we saw and heard from the candidates.  Given the times in which we live, I don鈥檛 believe it鈥檚 hyperbole to call this a pivotal election.鈥�   

The panel of GWU experts included:  Dr. Elizabeth Amato, assistant professor of political science; Dr. Bob Carey, chair of the Department of Communication Studies; Dr. Casey Delehanty, assistant professor of political science; Dr. June Hobbs, professor and director of undergraduate research; and Dr. Jeff Tubbs, GWU vice president for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness. They selected a group of 16 students to attend and offer their questions and perceptions from the evening.

Downs began the pre-debate dialogue by asking what advice the panelists would give Biden and Trump. Amato suggested that when the two men talk about COVID-19 they should demonstrate compassion towards the suffering the virus has caused. Hobbs noted that both men should speak about things they care about.

When the debate was over, Downs asked the panelists, 鈥淚f you were watching this debate from another country, what would be your assessment of the health of American democracy?鈥�  Hobbs replied that the debate was a good example of the American stereotype鈥攍oud, screaming, talking over one another. Carey noted that the candidates鈥� speech and actions had not represented democracy. Tubbs described the scene as chaos. 鈥淚t patterned a lot of the talk shows鈥攊t鈥檚 always an insult or isolated incident that only served to create more angst among the opponent,鈥� Tubbs stated.

The panelists gave a slight edge to Biden for the evening, noting that Trump was too combative. 鈥淭rump was doing well at hitting points that looked really good for him, but Trump couldn鈥檛 get out of his own way and talk about the things he was winning at,鈥� Delehanty observed. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think Biden hurt himself a lot.鈥�

Hobbs added, 鈥淚 wish Mr. Trump would come to take my rhetoric course鈥攔ed herring, slippery slopes, false dilemma鈥攈e let himself get rattled. Biden was prepared, he managed to stay cool.鈥�

The students were not impressed with the performance of either candidate. Luke Beamer summed it up this way, 鈥淚 feel like I was watching me and my brother grow up on TV, instead of building our towers higher, they are pulling the floorboards out from one another. When I look on the screen, I can鈥檛 see myself as a person. There is not a party to put yourself to鈥攊t鈥檚 a person. The mediator put the questions out there; I don鈥檛 think we got the answers we wanted.鈥�

Talen Frances commented, 鈥淣obody won. I was disappointed in the lack of information, and I could not focus because they made so many statements that were not informed enough.鈥�

Downs鈥� final question related to expectations for the October 7 vice presidential debate. The panelists agreed that, unlike other years, the stakes are high for the VP candidates. Amato advised, 鈥淰ice presidential debates usually don鈥檛 matter that much, but we will hear a much clearer presentation of the candidates鈥� positions. It may be a better example of a democratic debate.鈥�

Located in the North Carolina foothills, 麻豆破解版 is a private, Christian, liberal arts university. 麻豆破解版 emphasizes a strong student-centered experience and rigorous academics to prepare students to become effective leaders within the global community. Ignite your future at 麻豆破解版.edu. 

The information, views and opinions expressed by students or employees do not necessarily represent the views and/or opinions of 麻豆破解版.